« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2010, 07:09:38 pm »
The varomatic belt will beat the need for gearchanges but the Bug has a nice gearbox and is quasi sporty. Where it losses out is clearly the IC is governed to a top speed and the belt creates a lot of drag. There are some mods that can be done but a Bug can probobly happily do 70 and return around 45 mpg if working properly. The IC will be more like 30 mpg! It is not what it was designed for. However despite its narrow track I think it would out handle a Bug so it would be interesting down a B road. Surprised? All the weight other than the driver is low so that means the centre of gravity is too. The car is centrally ballanced, the Bug is not. The weight is over the rear axle and I am told the front does not let go first. So I think a bit of chassis/suspension adjustment would produce something that might prove very stable and predictable. I found the Bug's handling fragile at best and I would not want to be on the limit as I do not trust it.
Isetta head on the pillow time Bob. Yes actually it would be a fine unit for a TG500 replica thingy but on a proper gearbox I think. Less power lose and 36 BHP free to apply to the road after some minor tweaks.
Mmm Daf! Had a pick up, 33 and 44. Great cars and linked with Goggomobil, the Bentley of bubblecars, vaguely of course.
Logged
Messerschmitt set, Goggo Darts, Heinkel 175, Fiat Jolly, Autobianchi, Fairthorpe Electron Minor, Borgward, Isuzu Trooper
Citroen BX 17TZD & GTI 16v
Held - MG Magnette ZB & 4/44
For sale - Vellam Isetta, Bamby, AC Type 70, Velorex, Church Pod, Reliant Mk5, KR200, Saab 96, Bellemy Trials, Citroen BXs