Alan, whilst I respect your views on nondisclosure of a car's new owner when it is sold, if that car had already been put on our Register by some previous owner, it is the duty of the current owner to declare that he no longer owns that particular car. I agree that it is entirely up to the new owner to declare his ownership to the Register. I do think it is a pity that some folk are so secretive and I am sure they would not be if they were true enthusiasts. The Register has, after being in existence some 30 years, acquired a wealth of history and pictures of many cars which a true enthusiast I am sure would want to know about. Should any of you make a new acquisition why not Register it with Alastair with as much detail as possible and you may well be surprised to learn the vehicle is already known to us and we have history that will be of news to you,whats more should this prove to be the case you do not have pay to put it on the Register. In this way many gaps can be filled in, cars we had thought to have been destroyed may come to light and you could fill in the gaps in your knowledge. Alastair will always respect your wishes should you prefer to remain an unknown owner, details that we have on the Register are never released without the permission of the current owner. However, I feel even if a car is owned for its value alone which I feel many are these days, any added provenance can only add to that value. Maybe this could be a new topic for discussion as the way forward for the Register of Unusual Microcars needs to be decided to meet the need of the next generation of owners . Jean